6我们已经看见,罗得与亚伯拉罕分开,乃是分裂以及今日自由团体的种子。谁是那次分裂的原因?错不在亚伯拉罕一边,乃在罗得一边。罗得家的人也许会争辩说,『我们不也是神的子民么?为甚么你们亚伯拉罕家的人总说你们是神的子民?』不错,罗得家是神子民的一部分,但他们离开了神的见证人和见证,就是亚伯拉罕和他所作的见证。神的见证人和见证是在希伯仑幔利橡树旁亚伯拉罕的帐棚那里,不是在所多玛城的罗得那里。在十八和十九章我们看见,神和两个天使很高兴的与亚伯拉罕在一起,一同享受午餐和亲密的交通。但天使去邪恶的所多玛城时,神没有与他们同去;祂留在亚伯拉罕那里。两个团体都是神的子民,但神的同在在那里?神的同在只随著亚伯拉罕家。神的同在随著亚伯拉罕家,因为他的家是神典型的子民,并且有神见证的正确地位。罗得虽是神的一个子民,但他不在希伯仑幔利橡树旁的正确立场上;他在所多玛,在分裂和自由团体的立场上。神所有的子民既是祂的家,就该住在希伯仑的幔利橡树旁,在那里神能友好并亲密的访问他们。我们在这里能看见召会和自由团体的不同:一切的自由团体都是神的子民,但召会是在『希伯仑』的『幔利橡树』旁,不断的享受神亲密的同在。那么自由团体如何呢?就和罗得家的情形一样,神没有与他们相聚。他们是神的子民,神关心他们,不忘记他们,但祂的同在没有随著他们。天使离开,去所多玛拯救罗得和他的家之后,神的同在还是随著祂亲爱的朋友亚伯拉罕。你在那里?是与亚伯拉罕的家同在希伯仑呢,还是与罗得的自由团体同在所多玛?圣经岂没有说罗得是义人么?不错,彼后二章七和八节清楚的告诉我们,罗得是义的。自由团体中的人不是得救的么?他们当然是得救的。但看看他们的情况:自由团体中的人,乃是在被神定罪的地方。这点在神圣启示的光照里是很清楚的。假定你活在亚伯拉罕和罗得的时代,你要与那一个团体在一起?也许你会说,『你说罗得的团体是分裂;亚伯拉罕的团体不也是分裂么?亚伯拉罕的团体或罗得的团体都不是整体,他们都是一样的。亚伯拉罕家和罗得家都是神的子民,你为甚么把两家区分得这么大?两家既然都是神的子民,我今天要和罗得在一起,明天要去访问亚伯拉罕。』你可以和罗得在一起,但神不愿意。这有很大的不同。除了那在正确立场上,能与神有亲密交通的家,还有一个自由团体。今天的情况是这粒种子进一步的发展。对于自由团体要诚实公平。他们中间有神的见证么?没有,神在自由团体中没有彰显。他们为所欲为,他们没有见证人或见证。罗得家成了这样一个自由团体,因为这家离开了亚伯拉罕和他所作的见证。倘若我是罗得,有我们今天所有的光,我会说,『亚伯拉罕叔叔,即使你逼我离开你,我也不肯走。你就是不喜欢我,我还要抱你、亲你。我要和你在一起,因为你是神的见证人,并且因为神的见证与你同在。我绝不弃掉这见证。』今天我们该有这种态度。虽然我们也许不高兴召会中的弟兄,但我们该说,『弟兄们,虽然我对你们觉得不愉快,虽然你们会苦待我,但我绝不离开神的见证。』古时自由团体的难处的由来、根源,乃是这团体离开了神的见证人和见证。
6We have seen that Lot’s separation from Abraham was the seed both of division and of today’s free groups. Who was the cause of that division? The fault was not on Abraham’ss i de; it was on Lot’ss i de. The members of Lot’s family might have argued, “Aren’t we also God’sp eople? Why do you, the members of Abraham’s family, always say that you are the people of God?” Yes, Lot’s family was apart of the people of God, but they had left God’s witness and testimony, which were Abraham and what he was testifying. God’s witness and testimony were at the tent of Abraham by the oaks of Mamre in Hebron, not with Lot in the city of Sodom. In chapters eighteen and nineteen we see that God and the two angels were happy to stay with Abraham, enjoying dinner and intimate fellowship with him. But when the angels went to the wicked city of Sodom, God did not go with them; He remained with Abraham. While both groups were God’sp eople, where was God’s presence? Only with Abraham’s family. God’s presence was with Abraham’s family because his family was the typical people of God and had the proper standing of God’s testimony. Although Lot was one of God’s people, he was not on the proper ground by the oaks of Mamre in Hebron; he was in Sodom, on the ground of division and free groups. All God’sp eople, being His family, should dwell by the oaks of Mamre in Hebron, where God can pay them a friendly and intimate visit. Here we can see the difference between the church and the free groups: all the free groups are God’sp eople, but the church is by the “oaks of Mamre” in “Hebron,” continually enjoying God’s intimate presence. What then about the free groups? As it was with the case of Lot’s family, God does not meet with them. They are His people, and He cares for them and does not forget them, but His presence is not with them. After the angels left for Sodom to rescue Lot and his family, God’s presence was with Abraham, His dear friend. Where are you—with Abraham’s family in Hebron or with Lot’s free group in Sodom? Does not the Bible say that Lot was a righteous man? Yes, we are clearly told in 2 Peter 2:7 and 8 that Lot was righteous. Are not the people in the free groups saved? Certainly they are. But look at the situation: the people in the free groups are in a place which is under God’s condemnation. This is clear in the enlightenment of the divine revelation. Suppose you were alive during the days of Abraham and Lot. With which group would you have been? Perhaps you would have said, “You say that Lot’s group is a division. Isn’t Abraham’s group also a division? Neither Abraham’s group nor Lot’s group is the whole body. They both are the same. Why do you make so much of the difference between Abraham’s family and Lot’s family when both of them are God’sp eople? Since both are God’sp eople, today I will be with Lot and tomorrow I will visit Abraham.” Although you might stay with Lot, God would not. This makes a great difference. Besides the family which was on the ground where they could have intimate fellowship with God, there was a free group. Today’s situation is a further development of this seed. Be honest and fair about the free groups. Is there the testimony of God among them? No, God is not expressed in the free groups. They do whatever they like, and there is no witness or testimony with them. Lot’s family became such a free group because it was apart from Abraham and what he was testifying. If I had been Lot, having the light which we have today, I would have said, “Uncle Abraham, even if you force me to leave you, I would refuse to go. If you don’t like me, I would still embrace and kiss you. I would stay with you because you are God’s witness and because the testimony of God is with you. I will never forsake this testimony.” We should have this attitude today. Although we may not be happy with the brothers in the church, we should say, “Brothers, although I don’t feel happy with you and although you may mistreat me, I will never leave God’s testimony.” The source, the root, of the problem of the ancient free group was its departing from God’s witness and testimony.