4我们在马可福音看见主是奴仆救主,这与约翰福音所启示的深奥事项,成为对比。马可福音没有约翰福音的神救主,马太福音的君王救主,或路加福音的人救主。马可福音陈明基督特别的一面,就是奴仆救主的一面。约翰福音讲到神,马太福音讲到君王,路加福音讲到人,马可福音则讲到奴仆。我们不大会期望听见关于一个奴仆超越、深奥且希奇的事迹。就一面来说,讲解马可福音并不容易。在雅各书生命读经里,我们著重说到保罗著作和雅各书的对比。保罗的著作比雅各的著作在水平上高很多。保罗的著作是在神圣的水平上,在神的水平上,启示神圣的分赐,为著完成神的永远定旨。因此,保罗的书信有神圣经纶的启示。雅各书的水平远低于保罗的书信。保罗的著作是在神圣的水平上,雅各书则在人的水平上,强调基督徒实行上的完全。雅各在书信中论到敬虔与性格的事。雅各书和保罗书信之间的不同实在非常大。我们怎能把属人水平上的事物与神圣水平上的事物作比较?怎能拿基督徒实行上的完全与神圣的经纶相比较,或是拿道德的生活与活基督相比较?这是无从比较的。我们若要明白基督徒实行上的完全是甚么意义,就要来看雅各书。论到基督徒的完全,没有比雅各书再好的了。譬如,你想想看,雅各怎样论到智慧:『惟独从上头来的智慧,先是纯洁的,后是和平的、和蔼的、柔顺的,满有怜悯和善果,没有偏见,没有假冒。』(三17。)雅各又说,『并且义的果子,乃是由那些制造和平的人,在和平中所种植的。』(18。)这种教导的确比孔子的教导高明得多。关于基督徒的完全和人的道德,雅各书是卓越的。因此,我们在这一方面都应当尊重雅各。然而,无论雅各所写论到基督徒之完全的著作何等卓越,他只不过留在人的水平上,而人的水平是不能与神圣的水平相比的。
4In contrast to the profound matters revealed in the Gospel of John, in Mark’s Gospel we see the Lord as the Slave-Savior. In the Gospel of Mark we do not have the God-Savior, as in John, the King-Savior, as in Matthew, or the Man-Savior, as in Luke. The Gospel of Mark presents a particular aspect of Christ, the aspect of the Slave-Savior. In John we have God; in Matthew, the King; in Luke, the Man; and in Mark, the Slave. We would hardly expect to hear excellent, profound, marvelous things about a slave. There is a sense in which it is not easy to speak on the Gospel of Mark. In the Life-study of James we emphasized the contrast between the writings of Paul and the book of James. The writings of Paul are on a much higher level than those of James. Paul’s writings are on a divine level, on God’s level, and reveal the divine dispensing for the fulfillment of God’s eternal purpose. Therefore, in the Epistles of Paul we have a revelation of the divine economy. The book of James is on a much lower level. Whereas Paul’s writings are on a divine level, the book of James is on a human level and emphasizes practical Christian perfection. In his Epistle James deals with matters of godliness and character. The differences between the Epistle of James and the Epistles of Paul are actually very great. How could we compare something on the human level with something on the divine level? How can we compare practical Christian perfection with the divine economy, or compare living ethically with living Christ? There is no comparison. If we would know the meaning of practical Christian perfection, we need to come to the Epistle of James. Concerning Christian perfection, nothing is better than the book of James. Consider, for example, what James says concerning wisdom: “But the wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceable, forbearing, compliant, full of mercy and good fruits, impartial, unfeigned” (James 3:17). James also says, “The fruit of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace” (v. 18). This teaching certainly is much higher than that of Confucius. Concerning Christian perfection and human ethics, the book of James is excellent. In this regard we all need to respect James. Nevertheless, no matter how excellent James’ writing may be regarding Christian perfection, he remains on the human level, and the human level cannot compare to the divine level.