13在行传十八章,我们看见保罗仍然有犹太人的愿,(徒十八,)这是犹太人为感谢神,在任何地方,藉著剪发所履行的一种个人的愿。保罗知道小亚细亚各大城都有犹太人。他晓得当他旅经各城时,会先在犹太人中间作工。他也许认为带著未受割礼的青年同工,对他福音的工作会是一大阻挠。因此,可能是为著福音工作的缘故,保罗给提摩太行了割礼。他这么作,可能是为著能在犹太教气氛和环境都占优势的地方作工。然而,当保罗上耶路撒冷为真理争战,对抗割礼的异端时,却特意带著未受割礼的提多同去。我们研读行传十六章与加拉太二章,也许会对保罗的弹性有深刻的印象。他到耶路撒冷为割礼争战时,带著未受割礼的同工同去。保罗这样作,也许是要表明他对割礼强烈的反对。正如我们已经看见的,加拉太二章一至三节包括在行传十五章的事件中。紧接著行传十五章的会议,保罗在第二次出外尽职传福音时,带著提摩太并给他行了割礼。我们若是西拉,我们会说,『保罗,你在作甚么?你不坚固。起先你反对割礼,现在却给提摩太行割礼。』然而,我们可以替保罗说,他不是不坚固,乃是有弹性。他给提摩太行割礼并没有错。他在加拉太所写受割礼不受割礼全无效力的话,可应用于行传十六章提摩太的事例。我们可以领会这话的意思,即保罗顾到受割礼与不受割礼这两面。
13In chapter eighteen of Acts we see that he still had a Jewish vow (v. 18), a private vow that could be performed in any place by the Jews for thanksgiving, with the 18 shearing of the hair. Paul knew that there were Jews in all the leading cities of Asia Minor. He realized that as he traveled through these cities to work among the people, he would first carry out a work among the Jews. He may have thought that it would be a great frustration to his gospel work to have with him an uncircumcised young co - worker. Therefore, it may have been for the sake of his gospel work that Paul had Timothy circumcised. He may have done this in order to be able to carry out his work where the Jewish atmosphere and environment were still prevailing. However, when Paul went to Jerusalem to fight for the truth and against the heresy of circumcision, he purposely brought Titus with him, one who had not been circumcised. As we study Acts 16 and Galatians 2 we may be impressed with Paul’s flexibility. When he went to Jerusalem to fight against circumcision, he brought with him a co-worker who was not circumcised. Paul may have done this in order to show that he was strongly opposed to circumcision. As we have seen, Galatians 2:1-3 was included in the events of Acts 15. Then immediately after the conference in Acts 15, Paul, when he was about to go forth to preach the gospel on his second journey of ministry, took Timothy and had him circumcised. If we had been Silas, we might have said, “Paul, what are you doing? You are not stable. First you oppose circumcision, and now you are having Timothy circumcised.” On Paul’s behalf, however, we may say that he was being flexible, not unstable. His having Timothy circumcised may not have been wrong. The word he wrote in Galatians regarding neither circumcision nor uncircumcision availing anything may be interpreted as applying to the case of Timothy in Acts 16. We may understand this word to mean that Paul covered both the side of circumcision and the side of uncircumcision.