5堕落的人既然想要作丈夫,神就将律法颁赐给他。律法不是要给妻子,乃是要给堕落的丈夫。因此,这律法成为旧人的律法,丈夫的律法。(罗七2。)然而,神的本意不是要旧人遵守律法,因为旧人无法遵守律法。律法的颁赐,乃是要叫旧人被暴露。人犯了很大的错误,以为神赐人律法,是要人遵守律法。相反的,神赐人律法,是要人干犯律法;因著干犯律法,人才可能完全被暴露。你若想要遵守律法,你就错了;你若干犯律法,你就对了。律法赐下不是给人遵守的,律法赐下乃是给人干犯的。这思想很合乎圣经。罗马三章二十节说,『律法本是叫人知罪。』律法叫我们知罪。人若没有律法,就会继续犯罪而不承认这些是罪。人会原谅自己罪恶的行为,用好听的说法描述这些行为。然而,律法鉴定罪为罪。不仅如此,四章十五节说,『那里没有律法,那里就没有过犯。』你也许以为律法防止过犯,但这一节说律法暴露过犯。不但如此,五章二十节说,『律法插进来,是叫过犯增多。』律法插进来,不是叫过犯减少或受约束;那是我们天然的观念和想法。保罗说,律法插进来,是叫过犯增多,意思是过犯可能大量增加。因此,圣经指明,律法赐下,不是给我们遵守,乃是给我们违犯。
5Since fallen man wanted to be the husband, God gave him the law. The law is not intended for the wife, but for the fallen husband. Thus, this law becomes the law of the old man, the law of the husband (7:2). However, God did not intend that the old man keep the law, because the old man cannot keep it. The law was given that the old man might be exposed. People make a great mistake when they think that God gave man the law that he might keep it. On the contrary, God gave the law to man that he might break it and that, by breaking it, he might be completely exposed. If you try to keep the law, you are wrong; if you break the law, you are correct. The law was not given for man to keep; it was given for man to break. This thought is scriptural. Romans 3:20 says, “by law is knowledge of sin.” The law gives us the knowledge of sin. If man had no law, he would continue to commit sins, but would not recognize them as such. Man would excuse his sinful deeds, using favorable terms to describe them. However, the law identifies sin as sin. Moreover, Romans 4:15 says, “where no law is, neither is there transgression.” You may think that the law prevents transgression, but this verse says that the law exposes transgression. Furthermore, Romans 5:2 0 says, “But the law entered that the offense might abound.” The law did not enter that the offense might be reduced or restricted. This is our natural concept and thought. Paul says that the law entered that the offense might abound, meaning that it might increase plentifully. Thus, the Bible indicates that the law was not given for us to keep, but for us to violate.