2这些牛津大学的学生,包括卫斯理约翰和怀特腓乔治等人,立了一些规条,用以克制、改良自己的行为。他们用这些规律严格的克制自己。卫斯理约翰和其他人谨守这些规律,好过规矩的生活。他们认为这样的生活是圣别的。这种圣别就是卫斯理派所实行『无罪的完全』。今日拿撒勒人会、神的教会、和神召会等宗派,就是实行这种圣别,与卫斯理派属同一学派。到了十九世纪初期,在达秘带领之下的弟兄们被兴起来。他们从圣经里给我们看见,圣别并不是无罪的完全。他们用马太二十三章十七节给我们看见,殿如何叫金子成圣。叫金子成圣的乃是殿。他们的教师指出,在市场上的金子虽然没有罪,却是不圣别的;只有献给神并放在圣殿里的金子,才是圣别的。他们这种论据非常有力,无人能驳倒他们。不仅如此,他们又用马太二十三章二十节给我们看见,根据主耶稣所说的话,叫祭牲圣别的乃是坛。他们说,在圈中的牛或羊并没罪,可说相当的完全,但仍然是凡俗的。直等到牛羊在坛上献给神,那时才成为圣别的。弟兄们在道理上驳倒了圣别是无罪的完全这种说法,并且证明这种说法没有圣经根据,不过是人对圣别的天然观念。这些弟兄们素来以道理辩论著称,他们又以提前四章四、五两节指出,食物是因著圣徒的祷告成为圣别。食物在市场上的时候,是凡俗的。食物本身可能没有毛病,也没有罪,却是凡俗的。然而,当这食物放在圣徒的餐桌上,并且经过圣徒的祷告之后,就因著圣徒的祷告成为圣别了。根据这些经节,他们的圣经教师就说,圣别的意思乃是指地位的改变。他们说,圣别完全是地位的问题。譬如,在店舖里的金子是凡俗的,但被放在圣殿里就是圣别的,因为金子的地位改变了。照样,羊在圈里的时候是凡俗的,但放在坛上就是圣别的。在市场上的食物也是凡俗的,但经过圣徒祷告之后便圣别了。因此,弟兄们在这些经节的亮光中,教导人说圣别是指地位的改变。我们原先的地位是属世的,一点也不为著神;但是当我们被分别出来归给神之后,我们的地位改变了,因此我们也就圣别了。
2The group of students at Oxford that included John Wesley and George Whitefield adopted certain regulations, called methods, that they used to control, correct, and be have themselves. They were very strict to control themselves by these methods. John Wesley and the others kept these methods in order to have a proper living. They came to consider that kind of living holy. This is the holiness practiced by the Methodists as sinless perfection, a perfection without sin. The Church of the Nazarene, the Church of God, and the Assembly of God today practice a kind of holiness that is of the same school as the holiness of the Methodists. Then in the early part of the nineteenth century, the Brethren under the leadership of John Nelson Darby were raised up. The Brethren showed from the Bible that holiness is not sinless perfection. Using Matthew 23:17, they showed how the temple sanctified the gold. It was the temple that made the gold holy. These Brethren teachers pointed out that the gold in the market place, although there was nothing sinful about it, was not holy until it had been offered to God and put into His holy temple. Only then was the gold sanctified. Their argument was very strong, and no one could defeat them. Furthermore, using Matthew 23:20, the Brethren teachers showed that, according to the words of the Lord Jesus, the altar sanctifies the sacrifice. They argued that an ox or a lamb, when in the fold, might have been sinless and perfectly all right. Nevertheless, it was common. It was not holy until it was offered to God on the altar, at which time it was sanctified. Doctrinally speaking, the Brethren defeated the teaching that holiness is a matter of sinless perfection, proving that it had no ground in the Scriptures and that it is a human concept of holiness. The Brethren, famous for their doctrinal debates, also appealed to 1 Timothy 4:4-5, which says that food is sanctified by the saints’ prayer. When that food is in the marketplace, it is common. There may be nothing wrong with it and it may have no sin, but it is common. However, when that same food is placed on the saints’ dining table and is prayed over by the saints, it is sanctified by the saints’ prayer. Using all of these verses, the Brethren teachers showed that sanctification means a change of position. They said that sanctification is altogether a positional matter. Gold, for example, is common when it is still in the store, but when it is put into the temple it is holy. Its position has been changed. Like wise, when a lamb is still in the fold, it is common, but when it is placed on the altar it is holy. The food in the market place is also common, but it is sanctified by the prayers of the saints. So, in the light of all these verses, the Brethren taught that holiness means a change of position. Originally, our position was worldly and not at all for God. When we are separated unto God, our position is changed and, as a result, we become holy.